Vendor Comparison

Connection (PC Connection) Alternatives: When Solaris Wireless Fits

This is a neutral comparison of Connection (formerly PC Connection) and Solaris Wireless for institutional device procurement. Connection (PC Connection) is a strong choice for many engagements; Solaris is the right fit for a specific subset (custom Android OS provisioning, MVNO subscriber handsets, government rapid response, ITAR/EAR controlled supply, Starlink wholesale, end-of-life specialist sourcing). The page below covers each vendor's strengths, the capability overlap, and a clear when-to-use-which recommendation.

Connection (formerly PC Connection): where they are strong

Connection (formerly PC Connection) is an established enterprise IT distributor with capabilities that overlap with Solaris Wireless across several engagement types. The list below reflects Connection (PC Connection)'s genuine strengths; we recommend buyers consider both vendors in any engagement that touches their core capability set.

Where Solaris Wireless differentiates

Solaris Wireless is institutional-only and specialised on the device-supply layer. The capability set below is where the engagement profile differs from broader enterprise IT distribution.

Capabilities both vendors cover

When to use which

Use Connection (PC Connection) when: the engagement is broad enterprise IT with significant laptop/workstation imaging needs, the buyer wants SEWP-vehicle alignment for federal civilian procurement, the order spans laptops + peripherals + software + networking as a bundled procurement, or international footprint (GlobalServe) is the primary requirement.

Use Solaris Wireless when: the engagement is mobile-device-specific with MVNO custom OS, kiosk-mode flashing, government ruggedised rapid response, Starlink wholesale, EOL specialist sourcing, ITAR/EAR controlled supply, or direct-to-end-user / direct-to-subscriber fulfilment across multiple geographies with asset-tagged tamper-evident packaging.

Side-by-side comparison

Connection (PC Connection) vs Solaris Wireless: institutional device procurement comparison
Capability Connection (PC Connection) Solaris Wireless
Standard MDM enrolment (ABM, Zero-Touch, Knox)YesYes
Custom Android OS flashing at scaleLimitedYes (10,000+ kiosk units)
SIM lock and carrier branding for MVNO handsetsNoYes
TAA-compliant federal procurementYesYes
ITAR/EAR controlled hardware brokerageLimitedYes (DDTC-coordinated)
72-hour rapid response from pre-cleared inventoryNoYes (5 global nodes)
Starlink wholesale distribution (Standard, Business, Maritime)NoYes
End-of-life and hard-to-find specialist sourcingNoYes (40+ SKUs located)
Direct-to-end-user fulfilment as defaultAvailableDefault
Google-approved vendorNot specifiedYes (since 2016)

How to evaluate both vendors

For institutional buyers running a procurement evaluation, the practical recommendation is to scope both vendors against the specific engagement. Submit the same RFI to both with: device specification and quantity, MDM platform, custom-provisioning needs (custom OS, SIM lock, branding), geographic distribution, compliance constraints (TAA, NDAA, FIPS, ITAR/EAR, HIPAA), target lead time, and contract vehicle preference. Compare written proposals side by side. For a sample order, both vendors typically support 50-100 unit pilot batches before scaling.

Solaris Wireless responds within one business day with pricing, lead time and contract proposals. For broader vendor comparison context, see Zero-Touch Android deployment and bulk iPhone enterprise procurement.

Considering Solaris Wireless alongside Connection (PC Connection)?

Send us your scope. We respond within one business day with pricing, lead time and a contract proposal. Run the comparison side by side.

Request a Proposal